These may be grasses, low flowering plants, herbs, mosses, and others. Then the populations of these pioneer species, which was once high during the first years since the fire, decreases as other species also move to the area. As time passes, the pine trees dominate and create a lot of shade. Next, we see shade-loving trees such as ash, poplar, hickory, oak, and other species that are well-adapted to thriving in lower light conditions changing the community again.
There will likely still be some pines for a period of time as the transition occurs, but again the species within the community changes, the population numbers of each of those species changes, and the distribution also changes. How can ecological succession change a population? If left unattended, a garden will quickly become a weed patch in which the weakly competitive garden plants are choked out and destroyed by the robustly productive weeds.
A gardener's only course of action is to spend a great deal of time and energy weeding the garden. This energy input is directly proportional to the "energy" inherent in the force of ecological succession. If you extrapolate this very small scale scenario to all of the agricultural fields and systems on Earth and visualize all of the activities of all of the farmers and gardeners who are growing our foods, you begin to get an idea of the immense cost in terms of time, fuel, herbicides and pesticides that humans pay every growing season because of the force of ecological succession.
There is a concept in ecological succession called the "climax" community. The climax community represents a stable end product of the successional sequence.
An established Oak-Poplar Forest will maintain itself for a very long period of time. Its apparent species structure and composition will not appreciably change over observable time. To this degree, we could say that ecological succession has "stopped". We must recognize, however, that any ecosystem, no matter how inherently stable and persistent, could be subject to massive external disruptive forces like fires and storms that could re-set and re-trigger the successional process.
As long as these random and potentially catastrophic events are possible, it is not absolutely accurate to say that succession has stopped. Also, over long periods of time "geological time" the climate conditions and other fundamental aspects of an ecosystem change. These geological time scale changes are not observable in our "ecological" time, but their fundamental existence and historical reality cannot be disputed. No ecosystem, then, has existed or will exist unchanged or unchanging over a geological time scale.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons License. View Terms of Use. What is "ecological succession"? For example, The Resource Ratio Hypothesis, proposed by David Tilman , models successional shifts in plant communities based on the assumption that succession is driven by a tradeoff in competition for nutrients in early succession, and for light in late succession.
Other researchers, such as Henry Horn have used transition matrix models and Markovian models to measure rates of succession and predict the outcomes of succession. Figure 6: Plant diversity increases throughout succession. Fields were last plowed in While the process of succession has been studied by ecologists since the turn of the 20th century, it is still very much a dynamic field of study today. Multiple, complex mechanisms can all interact to result in predictable patterns of change in communities over time.
Recently, ecologists have used principles of succession to inform the applied ecological fields of Restoration Ecology and Invasion Biology. References and Recommended Reading Bazzaz, F. Odum, E. The Strategy of Ecosystem Development. Science , Reiners, W. Plant diversity in a chronosequence at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecology 52, Article History Close. Share Cancel.
Revoke Cancel. Keywords Keywords for this Article. Save Cancel. Flag Inappropriate The Content is: Objectionable. Flag Content Cancel. Email your Friend. Submit Cancel. This content is currently under construction.
Explore This Subject. Topic rooms within Community Ecology Close. No topic rooms are there. Or Browse Visually. Other Topic Rooms Ecology. Student Voices. Creature Cast. Simply Science. Green Screen. Green Science. Bio 2. The Success Code. Why Science Matters. The Beyond. Plant ChemCast. Postcards from the Universe. Brain Metrics. Mind Read.
Eyes on Environment. Accumulating Glitches. Saltwater Science. As succession proceeds, many environmental factors may change through the influence of the community. Especially in primary succession, this leads to more stable, less severe environments.
At the same time interactions between species of plant tend to intensify competition for basic resources such as water, light, space, and nutrients. Successional change results from the normal complex interactions between organism and environment which lead to changes in overall species composition. Whether succession is promoted by changing environmental factors or competitive interactions, species composition alters in response to availability of niches.
Populations occurring in the community at a point in succession are those able to provide propagules such as seeds to invade the area, being sufficiently tolerant of current environmental conditions, and able to withstand competition from members of other populations present at the same stage Fig. Species lacking these qualities either become locally extinct or are unable to enter and survive in the community. In some cases, successional sequences may take hundreds of years to complete, and direct observation at a given site is not possible.
Adjacent sites may be identified as successively older stages of the same successional sequence, if it is assumed that conditions were similar when each seral stage was initiated.
Early stages of succession tend to be relatively rapid, whereas the rates of species turnover and soil changes become slower as the community matures. Eventually an approximation to the steady state is established with a relatively stable community, the nature of which has aroused considerable debate. Earlier, the so-called climax vegetation was believed to be determined ultimately by regional climate and, given sufficient time, any community in a region would attain this universal condition.
This unified concept of succession, the monoclimax hypothesis, implies the ability of organisms progressively to modify their environment until it can support the climatic climax community.
Although plants and animals do sometimes ameliorate environmental conditions, evidence suggests overwhelmingly that succession has a variety of stable end points. This hypothesis, known as the polyclimax hypothesis, suggests that the end point of a succession depends on a complex of environmental factors that characterize the site, such as parent material, topography, local climate, and human influences.
Actions of the community on the environment, termed autogenic, provide an important driving force promoting successional change, and are typical of primary succession where initial environments are inhospitable.
Alternatively, changes in species composition of a community may result from influences external to the community called allogenic. Whereas intrinsic factors often result in progressive successional changes, that is, changes leading from simple to more complex communities, external allogenic forces may induce retrogressive succession, that is, toward a less mature community. For example, if a grassland is severely overgrazed by cattle, the most palatable species will disappear.
As grazing continues, the grass cover is reduced, and in the open areas weeds characteristic of initial stages of succession may become established. In some instances of succession, the food web was based on photosynthetic organisms and there was a slow accumulation of organic matter, both living and dead.
This is termed autotrophic succession. In other instances, however, addition of organic matter to an ecosystem initiates a succession of decomposer organisms which invade and degrade it. Such a succession is called heterotrophic. See also: Eutrophication ; Productivity ; Food web. Following the partial or complete destruction of an established community by disturbing events, such as fire or the removal of all trees clearfelling , and similarly on the cessation of grazing or tillage, a sequence of species invasion and replacement ensues.
0コメント